SAMPLE #72 WRITING TASK 2(40 MINS)(AT LEAST 250 WORDS)(GENERAL TRAINING/ACADEMICS)
In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion about this? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
SAMPLE ANSWER:
Presently, the problem of a living space has risen to prominence in many places of the country. There is absolutely no way to build new houses in some cities, and a lot of people suggest to carry out construction in the countryside. However, it is a controversial topic introducing heavy debates.
Opponents of urbanization of formerly rural areas state that it would cause a dramatic effect on the natural exosystem of such places. The most drastic consequences are caused by the infrastructure that necessarily follows any human settlement - that is, roads, power lines, means of water supply and such. The construction of those engineering projects leads to the destruction of natural biomes of ponds, rivers, and forests, causing many animals to migrate or go extinct. The arguments of environmentalists do make sense, but there also valuable ideas supporting the countryside occupation.
First of all, not even the most extreme supporters of spreading urbanization maintain that all of the countrysides should be filled with homes all over the place. In fact, there are good examples of even larger cities living perhaps not in harmony with surrounding nature, but at least in some form of cooperation. Having a considerable amount of parks inside inhabited area help both people to feel themselves better and plants and animals to have some sort of home. If I may present an example, the city of Zaporizhia where I live has a large island between the parts of the city which is covered with trees and largely unoccupied, being a nice counterpart to heavily populated nearby districts.
In conclusion, I would like to stress that while opponents of countryside settlements have many valid points, the situation is not as drastic as they portray it, and the co-existence of human population with nature is quite possible.(298 Words, Band 7)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion about this? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Presently, the problem of a living space has risen to prominence in many places of the country. There is absolutely no way to build new houses in some cities, and a lot of people suggest to carry out construction in the countryside. However, it is a controversial topic introducing heavy debates.
Opponents of urbanization of formerly rural areas state that it would cause a dramatic effect on the natural exosystem of such places. The most drastic consequences are caused by the infrastructure that necessarily follows any human settlement - that is, roads, power lines, means of water supply and such. The construction of those engineering projects leads to the destruction of natural biomes of ponds, rivers, and forests, causing many animals to migrate or go extinct. The arguments of environmentalists do make sense, but there also valuable ideas supporting the countryside occupation.
First of all, not even the most extreme supporters of spreading urbanization maintain that all of the countrysides should be filled with homes all over the place. In fact, there are good examples of even larger cities living perhaps not in harmony with surrounding nature, but at least in some form of cooperation. Having a considerable amount of parks inside inhabited area help both people to feel themselves better and plants and animals to have some sort of home. If I may present an example, the city of Zaporizhia where I live has a large island between the parts of the city which is covered with trees and largely unoccupied, being a nice counterpart to heavily populated nearby districts.
In conclusion, I would like to stress that while opponents of countryside settlements have many valid points, the situation is not as drastic as they portray it, and the co-existence of human population with nature is quite possible.(298 Words, Band 7)
click here for SAMPLE #71[GT] OR click here for SAMPLE #73[AC/GT]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Note:-The questions, sample writing tasks, top 6 words, its meaning, sentences, teaching methodology & related details are obtained from various sources.Please click here REFERENCES for details of sources.The role of web page owner is limited to finding & modifying the questions, words, sample writing tasks and editing the content for our intended purpose.The purpose of this page is to promote IELTS training and English education for free as far as possible.However, not to misuse this opportunity and to minimize the losses incur, a fee is being charged for training session conducted by the live trainer through online chat.]
No comments:
Post a Comment